HDTV and shooting home movies: 60i or 60P, which option is best?

Question
I shoot my home movies with a HighDef camera and it offers me the option of 60i or 60p. Is there any advantage using one or the other as to how it will appear on my HighDef Flat Panel Display?

– Ron S
Sarasota, Fla

Answer:
The question of 60i (interlaced) versus 60p (progressive) brings up several considerations. And the first part of the answer is that one is not necessarily better than the other.

You’re correct to consider your output device when shooting video. Watching video on a television versus your computer or a mobile device will influence how you film. We’ll start with a quick refresher on video encoding.

Interlaced video is what we all watched back in the CRT days, and it was simply because of technological limitations. Interlacing is a technique that virtually doubles the frame-rate of video in order to consume less bandwidth. In the case of 60i, each frame contains either the odd- or the even-numbered lines of the image. To the eye, you’re watching 60 frames-per-second rather than 30. We’re still stuck with interlacing in most hi-def broadcasts which are 1080i; although FOX is a notable exception at 720p.

Progressive video is what all digital displays render today. Each frame is scanned top to bottom with ever line present. Obviously this requires twice the bandwidth to maintain an equal bitrate. If one has the infrastructure to support said bandwidth, progressive video will always look better because the display doesn’t have to do any processing of the incoming signal. What goes in is what comes out.

When shooting home video, storage is probably the biggest issue to deal with. Simply put, video shot at 1080/60p will require twice as much space as that shot at 1080/60i. And sending interlaced footage to your HDTV means the content must be de-interlaced before its output to the screen. Depending on the quality of your display, that might not be a problem or it could introduce combing and line twitter artifacts as the TV stitches the interlaced frames into progressive ones. Check out the example below.

When filming motion, interlaced frames are not perfectly registered to one another when the time comes to combine two into one. A TV with good video processing can fix this error but most displays I’ve reviewed fail this test. It’s called 2:2 pulldown and very few TVs or disc players can do it properly. Oppo’s Blu-ray players are the best-known exception.

So the answer is if you have the storage, always shoot progressive video. But there is one more thing to consider. Shooting at 60 fps will make your video look very smooth, like a soap-opera. Consider that even though Hollywood has largely gone digital and can shoot at any frame-rate they want, they still shoot primarily at 24 fps. Of course, motion resolution is better at higher frame-rates but to most people it just looks un-natural. I think 60p video looks flat and phony compared to film. But that is my personal preference.

By the way, 24p takes less storage space than 60i! And make sure your HDTV can handle 24p correctly. Most 120 Hz LCD panels will repeat each frame five times if you turn off the interpolation (often called things like MotionFlow).

I’ll wrap this up with my recommendation. Buy plenty of storage so you can shoot progressive video all the time. If you’re filming an artistic subject; kids growing up, family time; try 24p. If you’re shooting fast action like sports, go for 60p.

– Chris Eberle, Senior Editor

Chris Eberle

Chris' passion for audio began when he took up playing the bassoon at age 12. During his third year at the New England Conservatory of Music, he won a position with the West Point Band where he served for 26 years as principal bassoonist. He retired from the Army in 2013 and is now writing full time and performing as a freelance musician in Central Florida. As an avid movie lover, Chris was unable to turn away the 50-inch Samsung DLP TV that arrived at his door one day, thus launching him irrevocably into an obsession with home theater. Dissatisfied with the image quality of his new acquisition, Chris trained with the Imaging Science Foundation in 2006 and became a professional display calibrator. His ultimate theater desires were realized when he completed construction of a dedicated cinema/listening room in his home. Chris is extremely fortunate that his need for quality audio and video is shared and supported by his wife of over 25 years. In his spare time he enjoys riding his recumbent trike at least 100 miles per week, trying out new restaurants, going to theme parks and spending as much time as possible watching movies and listening to music. Chris enjoys bringing his observations and discoveries about every kind of home theater product to as many curious and well-informed readers as possible. He is proud to be a part of the Team and hopes to help everyone enjoy their AV experiences to the fullest.

Recent Posts

TAD Labs Introduces the Reference Series TAD-C700 Preamplifier

Major refinements inside and out have taken the already solid performer to the next level…

4 hours ago

AXPONA 2024 Show Coverage Part 2.

Welcome everyone to the second installment of our AXPONA 2024 coverage. Just to quickly reiterate,…

6 hours ago

Juke Audio Juke+ Streaming Multi-Zone Amplifier

Can you use the words simple and whole house audio in the same sentence? I…

23 hours ago

Sennheiser Factory Tour

I got a chance to partake in an exclusive outing to Sennheiser's HQ in Tullamore…

2 days ago

Quad Revela 2 Floor-standing Speaker Review.

An elegant and buttoned-down loudspeaker that can still “kick it,” old school! Because of this…

3 days ago

Sonus faber Lumina II Amator Bookshelf Speaker Review

Sonus faber delivers high style and high performance from its Lumina II Amator Bookshelf Speakers.…

1 week ago