The projectors were split into single-laser and triple-laser categories. The eight displays in the single-laser category were BenQ’s V7050i (reviewed here at Secrets), Hisense 100L5G, ViewSonic X2000B, XGIMI Aura, Epson LS500, Samsung LSP7T, LG715Q, and Optoma’s Cinemax P2 (reviewed here at Secrets).
The triple-laser category is an emerging genre with newer models, some of which have just become available. We evaluated six units: the Formovie Theater, LG HU915QB, Hisense PX1-PRO, Samsung LSP9T, AWOL Vision LTV-3500, and Vava Chroma. The advantages to triple versus single laser are simple, extra brightness, and a wider color gamut. Also, the Formovie is one of a tiny handful of projectors that includes Dolby Vision support. The Hisense and AWOL projectors have that feature in beta testing.
With the projectors all calibrated to SMPTE standards by Dave Harper, ISF calibrator for ProjectorScreen.com, we set about judging them in three scenarios: out-of-box bright room mode with the lights turned on, SDR calibrated dark room and HDR calibrated dark room. For the first scenario, we viewed a variety of TV content like CNN, sports, and shows. For the dark room modes, we used movies mainly, along with reference footage from Planet Earth and other 4K and HDR-based documentaries.
The content was fed from a variety of sources: DirecTV Satellite Receiver, Oppo UDP-203 Disc Player, and a Kaleidescape server. We could also view patterns from a Murideo signal generator. Using a very sophisticated matrix system and a whole lotta’ HDMI cables, we could see the clips on every projector simultaneously. Though there were some hiccups as signal formats changed, it was easy for me and the other judges to make meaningful comparisons.
Our score sheets listed the projectors across the top and the criteria down the sides. For each scenario, we rated color accuracy, detail/sharpness, contrast/tone-mapping, and black level/shadow detail. We also viewed some 4,000-nit material in the HDR scenario to evaluate how each projector handled those difficult highlights. Needless to say, the JVC aced everything…
With a consistently strong showing in every metric, the BenQ V7050i won the single-laser category. All the judges agreed that it had the best image in all three scenarios. It was also the only projector of the entire showdown that didn’t need its settings checked every time we changed signal formats. Most of the other displays had trouble always keeping their calibrated settings in play. The BenQ’s only flaw was that it was the slowest to change formats. Part of this was the matrix system in use. When I reviewed the V7050i last year, I didn’t note any overt sluggishness. In fairness though, my reference is an old JVC/Anthem projector which is notoriously slow to lock onto a signal.
You can also see that no projector was significantly better or worse than any other. They are all pretty close in performance. And some did better with some content than others. While the BenQ would be my pick for its versatility and consistency, I would not turn any of these displays away. They all deliver a good picture.
In my opinion, none of the triple-laser displays looked significantly better than the ViewSonic. The main advantage to this technology is its extra light output and wider color gamut. These things will certainly help if you plan to use the projector in a media room with some ambient light. But in dark room settings, I see little reason to spend the extra money at present. Yes, there is a little more color saturation. But the gamuts of these projectors are not uniformly larger. Some add red, others add green or blue. None of them were consistent when showing DCI-P3 or Rec.2020 mastered content. Honestly, I preferred the single-laser models because their gamuts were more accurate overall.
The 2022 Laser TV Showdown was a fascinating, fun, and educational experience for me. Though the TV shootout is nothing new, this is the first time, to my knowledge, that 14 UST projectors have been lined up in the same place, at the same time, showing the same content. Making side-by-side comparisons is like gold in this business. We always get products to review one at a time and making meaningful comparisons between displays is difficult. I like to stick to the numbers and for the most part, that is a great way to decide on a purchase. But when you can calibrate a group of projectors to the same standard and show them in a single environment, a few more things come to light (pun intended).
As a category, UST projectors can replace a television given the right room. With a lenticular screen, which I consider a must if you plan to leave the lights on, the image is as good as a decent LCD panel. No, you will not be able to compete with a bright sunny window. Only the most searingly bright TV can accomplish that. But with moderate overhead or lamp lights, the image is bold, saturated, and well-detailed. And it’s bright enough to satisfy. The big thing here is of course… big, as in the screen. A UST projector starts at 100 inches, and some can easily fill a 120- or 150-inch screen. Sure, you can buy an 83-inch OLED or an 85-inch LCD, but nothing can truly replace the jumbo screen experience.
In this edition we bring you four selections of vinyl for you to enjoy in…
The power cords we use today in our high-end audio systems are far more sophisticated…
The SRS3100 Replacement Aims to Fulfil An Expectant Market Worldwide, May 9, 2024 — STAX…
My favorite bookshelf speaker has been the B&W 685 S1. It has been my favorite…
Even if you only have a modest collection of records, keeping them clean is a…
May 9, 2024 — Sonus faber is pleased to announce the launch of the Sonetto…