Musical Fidelity is rooted in the business of creating “budget audiophile” offerings that perform well while not breaking the bank. Over the years, Musical Fidelity has gone up-market to produce some very high-end products like the Titan amplifier and Nu-Vista line of components, but it returns to its high-value HiFi roots with the Musical Fidelity MX-VYNL Phono Stage. The MX-VYNL promises to provide more features and better performance at a lower cost than its Musical Fidelity M1-ViNL predecessor so let’s take a closer look and see if it succeeds in that goal.
The MX-VYNL offers a wide range of settings for moving magnet and moving-coil cartridges with unbalanced and balanced I/O in a compact, well-built package for a reasonable price.
Before I talk about the MX-VYNL, I must confess that I have owned and enjoyed the predecessor to the MX-VYNL, the now-discontinued Musical Fidelity M1-ViNL for many years and it has been a big part of my journey of vinyl rediscovery. When my wife and I first moved in together, she had a fairly low-end all-in-one Sony audio system with a built-in turntable as many value systems had at the time. My system was made up of higher fidelity components but it had no turntable, so my wife refused to get rid of her Sony system until I bought a turntable to allow her to play her records. This domestic compromise was the catalyst that sent me off on the exciting but arduous journey of learning about turntables, tonearms, cartridges, and of course phono preamplifiers. I hope to cover that journey and lessons learned in more detail in a separate technical article, but I’ll simply say that we auditioned dozens of permutations of all of the above components including not less than ten different phono preamplifiers. The range of models we evaluated included both cheaper and more expensive phono preamps than the M1-ViNL, but the M1-ViNL vanquished them all in our listening tests. In addition to sounding great, the M1 was a Swiss army knife with plenty of settings to support a wide range of cartridges and even allowed a moving coil and a moving magnet source to be connected at the same time for easy A/B testing. The M1-ViNL continues to be my reference phono preamplifier even though I’ve since acquired a Sutherland 20/20 which I also like.
A few years ago, I attended CES shortly after the release of the MX-VYNL. In chatting with the Musical Fidelity representatives there, I learned that the MX-VYNL was designed to be slightly better than the M1-ViNL in sound quality despite being offered for a lower list price of $899 (the outgoing M1 retailed for $1199). Sadly, the MX-VYNL at CES was not connected to a system so I was unable to audition it. Given my love for the M1-ViNL, I have since been curious if the MX could deliver on the promise of being even better for $300 less.
Combination MM/MC external phono stage
MM (low/high): 42 dB / 48 dB
MC (low/high): 57 dB / 63 dB
Balanced: 8V RMS
Unbalanced: 4V RMS
47 kΩ
50, 100, 200, 300, or 400pf
10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1.2k, or 47kΩ
150 pF
MM: MC:
Less than ± 0.1 dB.
MM: 23 dB
MC: 24 dB
MM: > 101 dB
MC: > 98 dB
MM: MC:
Output: 12 V/500mA DC
Input: 100-240VAC 50-60Hz universal worldwide supply
220 mm (W) x 53 mm (H) x 215 mm (D)
1.9 kg
$899
Musical Fidelity, Musical Fidelity Reviews, Phono Preamplifier, Phono Stage
Secrets Sponsor
Both the discontinued M1-ViNL and the MX-VYNL use the INA217 precision instrumentation amplifier chip from Texas Instruments. This chip is a very low-noise, high-gain amplifier designed to be used with low-output balanced sources which seems to make it a perfect choice for use in a phono amplifier. As implemented by Musical Fidelity, it produces a very precise and balanced sound that accurately reflects the sound of the source and allows for adjustable gain if implemented that way. The maximum gain of this chip is 1000x (or 60dB), so implementations are limited to that amount of gain unless they add more in another gain stage.
Though both designs are based on the INA217, the MX-VYNL…
Of these changes, the following offer the best potential for increased audio performance:
The Musical Fidelity MX-VYNL was shipped in a compact, padded retail box with a power adapter, interchangeable plugs for use in different countries, and a printed copy of the manual. This retail packaging was enclosed in an additional outer box to further protect the unit during shipping.
The following equipment was used with the MX-VYNL in this evaluation:
Cartridges:
Turntable:
Downstream:
When first listening to new equipment, I like to use very familiar tracks and initially keep the signal path as simple and pristine as possible; using the Koss ESP/950+E/90 combination directly attached to the MX-VYNL’s unbalanced outputs accomplishes both goals. The ESP/950s are not quite as detailed as the very best electrostatics (like the Stax SR-009), but they are more revealing than most headphones and all but the highest-fidelity loudspeaker systems.
I decided to start with the Rega Exact 2 cartridge because I had not used it since upgrading the sub-chassis and tonearm on my LP12 and switching to the Dynavector 17d3. Given all the upgrades, I was keen to find out how it would sound with a substantially upgraded turntable and the MX-VYNL handling amplification. I fitted the Exact 2 on the Graham tonearm and made all the necessary adjustments before doing any critical listening. For this test, I used unbalanced cables because I had not yet received the special DIN-to-mini-XLR cable (more on this later) required to connect the Graham to the MX-VYNL in balanced mode. I set the MX-VYNL for low gain given the high output of the Exact 2 cartridge and set the capacitance to 100pF per Rega’s documentation. I selected RIAA equalization as I prefer to preserve all of the low-frequency content for critical listening and connected my Koss headphones directly to the unbalanced outputs of the MX-VYNL.
Paul Simon, “Graceland”
To start, I chose Paul Simon’s 25th Anniversary reissue of Graceland, and I went directly to “Diamonds on the Soles of Her Shoes”. I like to use this track because it begins with the wonderful male acapella vocals of Ladysmith Black Mambazo and Paul Simon, and then adds a full band with weighty drums and bass that provides a great contrast between acoustic and amplified sounds.
I was immediately surprised to find that the upper midrange and treble harshness that I remembered from evaluating the Rega Exact 2 with a much less optimal tonearm and chassis configuration was now completely gone! In the place of rough edges, I now found smooth, subdued midrange and somewhat attenuated but clear highs. The bass was perhaps a bit too full and loose, but it’s so often hard to get full bass from a turntable that I forgave this transgression.
Another thing I like about this track is that it really helps you listen for proper reproduction of sibilance. On a well set up turntable with a very good phono preamplifier, you’ll hear that some of the S’s are perfectly clean and others (like when Simon sings the lyric “She was physically forgotten…”) have too much sizzle and a little distortion, likely due to microphone overload in the master recording. Some preamplifiers smooth over these subtleties or try to be too “exciting” by overdriving the signal so that all sibilances sound a little distorted and grainy. In this case, the MX-VYNL did a great job of differentiating between the two, so it passed the test with flying colors.
Stevie Ray Vaughan and Double Trouble, “Couldn’t Stand The Weather”
Next up was another well-worn album, Stevie Ray Vaughan and Double Trouble’s “Couldn’t Stand The Weather”. Many audiophiles will be familiar with “Tin Pan Alley (AKA Roughest Place in Town)” as it is frequently played on demo systems and at HiFi shows. It begins with Vaughan’s sultry blues guitar (with a tiny bit of 60Hz buzz from his amplifier) and subdued drums producing a brooding, meditative mix with lots of empty space and ambiance to let the notes linger and fade. The music builds and there are certain moments where the drums or guitar have loud, explosive transients (mimicking the whack of a 2×4 or a pistol shot) that can be quite surprising on a very dynamic system. With the Rega playing through the MX-VYNL, these moments were a tiny bit less dynamic than expected but still impressive.
The Dave Brubeck Quartet, “Time Further Out”
The final album I used is the followup to The Dave Brubeck Quartet’s classic jazz album “Time Out”, entitled “Time Further Out”. This album is very well-recorded and has a couple of standout tracks that beg to be used for evaluating HiFi. The first is called “Far More Drums”, which sounds like a drum solo broken up by a little piano here and there. The second is called “Unsquare Dance” which has some impressively-recorded rhythmic clapping with bass and piano. Both tracks are unusual, but sound great and scale well with increased fidelity of the playback system. Here, the Rega Exact + MX-VYNL combination provided a very organic and laid-back presentation that I think represents what many people enjoy when listening to analog sources and vinyl in particular. The sound was enjoyable, and natural, tending toward being a bit mellow.
It was at this point that I finally received the special and hard-to-obtain balanced cable from a manufacturer in Wales, UK, named Y. Tome Audio Cables that allowed me to evaluate the MX-VYNL in balanced mode. Moving coil cartridges are inherently balanced with the four pins on the cartridge providing a positive and negative phase signal for each channel and the tonearm usually acting as a common ground (most moving magnet cartridges tie the ground to one of the signal wires, thus preventing fully balanced operation for that channel). If your tonearm uses an SME-style 5-pin DIN connector, this cable will allow you to connect it to the MX-VYNL for fully balanced operation. The price was around $50 USD, which was very reasonable for such a well-made cable. At this point, it was time to switch to the more revealing Dynavector 17d3 and see how much better sound quality the same recordings could muster in balanced mode. After setting up the 17d3, I set the MX-VYNL for 100Ω, set the gain to +6dB, and flipped the switch on the back to “balanced”. I was greeted with a cheery blue LED illuminating the balanced indicator on the front panel indicating it was time for a second pass through these songs.
Graceland’s “Diamonds on the Soles of Her Shoes” was now even more finely drawn, benefiting greatly from the super-resolution and extended, flat frequency response provided by the Dynavector’s short all-diamond cantilever and micro-ridge stylus profile. The subtle phrasing of each male vocalist was now easier to make out, and when the drums came in, they did so with tighter low frequencies than the Rega Exact 2 could muster. I personally feel that high-res digital generally surpasses vinyl in resolution (it certainly betters it in measurements), but I did a short recording of the intro to this song at 24/192kHz on my MOTU Ultralite mk5 audio interface and compared it directly with the Apple Lossless master version of the same song from Apple Music. The differences were very small indeed. My wife, who has better ears than I do, actually slightly preferred the vinyl version recorded through the MX-VYNL. Regardless, nearly matching the sound quality of a lossless digital master recording is no small feat, and the MX-VYNL pulled it off with the help of equally capable upstream equipment.
Moving on to “Tin Pan Alley”, the balanced MX-VYNL extracted more subtle details like guitar reverb and decay. When transients called for it, they were even more explosive than the prior Exact 2/Unbalanced MX combo could muster. This song was less laid back, but in a way that I prefer from an audiophile recording played on a high-fidelity system.
On “Time Further Out”, the drums on “Far More Drums” were just that – Far more. They sounded more detailed, with sharper transients, and were overall punchier while providing more of the nuance (likely from properly rendered harmonics) that help you discern between the different types of drums being used. The piano notes were clearer and their decay was more realistic. On “Unsquare Dance”, the claps now almost sounded as if they were processed using some spatial enhancement effect; they threw a very wide soundstage and seemed to linger longer than with the Exact 2. In a sense, all things were improved as they should be with a step-up in cartridge resolution. This shows the fundamentals of the MX-VYNL are solid allowing it to scale well with better upstream sources.
Secrets Sponsor
For bench testing the MX-VYNL, I used the following equipment:
Oscilloscope (used for square wave signal generation and capture):
Inverse RIAA Equalization (to convert test signals with flat EQ to RIAA-equalized signals phono stages expect as input):
THD+N Measurements:
With no signal on the unbalanced connection, the spectrum is dominated by the 60Hz mains frequency interference and harmonics above it. This noise is exacerbated by the RIAA equalization which amplifies low frequencies.
When the input is shorted, however, this mains interference goes away.
I was unable to reach the low 101/98dB THD+N published by Musical Fidelity but achieved respectable noise figures of 83-87dB without a signal and approximately 65dB THD+N with an unbalanced signal that improves as the frequency increases and RIAA equalization has less impact. At 1kHz, the THD+N is close to the published specifications.
Intermodulation distortion was very low in level with only one visible side peak over 106dB below the 19kHz and 20kHz dual-tone signals.
10kHz (left) and 20kHz (right) square wave performance is stable with very rounded leading edges due to a slow roll-off in frequencies above 20kHz. The slew rate and frequency range could be greater to support the extended frequency response of some wide bandwidth cartridges like the Dynavector 17d3, but this is more than adequate to cover the audible frequency range.
The MX-VYNL will work with almost any combination of turntable and cartridge and will likely not be the weak link until the price of your upstream vinyl playback system is 5-10 times the price of the MX-VYNL.
The MX-VYNL retains the refined sound of its predecessor while making several noteworthy improvements. Accomplishing this at a lower price makes the MX-VYNL a great value in the world of phono preamplifiers. If your listening room has a suspended wood floor like mine and your preamplifier or processor provides balanced inputs, the MX-VYNL’s balanced outputs will allow placement of your turntable wherever it is least susceptible to footfalls without worry of noise or signal loss between the MX-VYNL and the rest of your system. The only challenge you may face with the MX-VYNL is finding the proper cable to connect it to a turntable with balanced outputs, but such cables are available if you look.
The power cords we use today in our high-end audio systems are far more sophisticated…
The SRS3100 Replacement Aims to Fulfil An Expectant Market Worldwide, May 9, 2024 — STAX…
My favorite bookshelf speaker has been the B&W 685 S1. It has been my favorite…
Even if you only have a modest collection of records, keeping them clean is a…
May 9, 2024 — Sonus faber is pleased to announce the launch of the Sonetto…
UK, 9th May 2024 — British audio specialist, Q Acoustics, introduces the affordable and high…