Receivers

NAD T 777 V3 AV Surround Sound Receiver Review

If you’re concerned about your AV receiver becoming obsolete, look no further than NAD’s T 777 V3 AV Surround Sound Receiver. It has five input/output card slots making it uniquely qualified to be the hub of a high-end theater or music system over the long haul. Many users are hanging on to older components because they are concerned with fast-changing technologies like HDMI and object-oriented surround sound. And their fears are not without merit.

HDMI 2.1 is just around the corner and with it will come a lot of obsolete receivers. Thanks to NAD’s Modular Design Construction, one can simply swap out a circuit board to enable the latest tech in the T 777 V3. Right now, for $2499, it delivers 80 watts-per-channel with seven amplifiers, Dolby Atmos, Dirac Live Room Correction, and 4K video passthrough. Streaming aficionados will enjoy BluOS and its vast universe of content.

Highlights

NAD T 777 V3 AV Surround Sound Receiver

  • 80 watts-per-channel (seven channels driven)
  • Pre-outs support up to 7.1.4 Dolby Atmos
  • Two sub outputs, six HDMI 2.0a inputs
  • 4K video passthrough, 4:4:4 at 60Hz
  • Dirac Live Room Correction
  • BluOS module for network streaming
  • High-end build quality
Introduction

NAD knows it’s next to impossible to prevent receiver obsolescence; or is it? Looking at the back of the flagship T 777 V3 AV Surround Receiver reveals, one sees not a mess of useless jacks, but five card slots that offer the latest connectivity, along with multi-channel inputs, two sub outs, and two tape loops. And all those cards can be replaced to add and upgrade features. So, with that fear allayed, let’s check out what it can do today. There’s plenty of power, 80 watts-per-channel by NAD’s honest power rating. They tend to come in low; I suspect I would measure higher numbers if I had the proper test gear. And in my recent review of the T 758 V3, its 60 rated watts had no trouble driving my four-ohm Axiom speakers. Seven amp channels support Dolby Atmos in a 5.1.2 configuration, or by using the supplied pre-outs, 5.1.4 or 7.1.4 is possible. Six HDMI 2.0a inputs accept high-bandwidth signals at Ultra HD resolution with 10-bit color up to 4:4:4 at 60Hz. And BluOS is included for streamed content. Oh, and did I mention Dirac Live? That superb room correction software is also included along with the obligatory setup mic.

Secrets Sponsor

A few weeks ago, I reviewed the T 758 V3 and was impressed by its amazing performance for the money. The T 777 V3 has more of everything that makes that receiver great. Let’s take a look.

NAD SURROUND SOUND RECEIVER SPECIFICATIONS:
Full Disclosure Power (7 channels driven):

7 x 80W

IHF Dynamic Power:

160W @ 8 ohms, 260W @ 4 ohms

Total Harmonic Distortion at rated power:

IM distortion at rated power:

Damping Factorg:

>60 @ 8 ohms

Input Sensitivity and Impedance:

1.15V (ref. 8 ohms, volume at 0dB)

Frequency Response:

±0.8dB (1kHz, 20Hz-20kHz)

Signal to Noise Ratio:

>92dB (rated power @ 8 ohms, A-WTD), >82dB (1W @ 8 ohms, A-WTD)

Idle Power:

70W

Standby Power:

Dimensions (WxHxD):

17 1/8” x 6 13/16” x 16 3/4”

Weight:

45.2lbs

Warranty:

Two years

MSRP:

$2499

Company:

NAD

SECRETS Tags:

NAD T 777 V3 AV Surround Sound Receiver, AV Receiver, Surround Sound, Dolby Atmos, Dirac Live, Ultra HD, AV Reciever 2018 Review

Linkbacks
Design

Since this review follows closely on the heels of my time with the T 758 V3, comparisons are unavoidable. Here it is in a nutshell – the T 777 V3 has more power, more connectivity, and more upgradability. It’s just… more. NAD’s honest power rating is 80 watts-per-channel with seven channels driven to .08% THD. I don’t have the ability to measure this but given the T 758 V3’s ability to drive my large four-ohm speakers to ear-bleeding levels while barely exceeding room temperature, I have no reason to doubt NAD’s claims. There are likely no speakers that cannot be safely and competently driven by the T 777 V3.

The seven amp channels are Class A/B tuned for high current and low distortion, supported by a toroidal transformer. Video is handled by a VM300 module and can pass Ultra HD signals in 4:4:4 format up to 60Hz. No processing is performed, the material is simply passed through unaltered from source to display. Processing assistance is provided by an ARM chip that enables streaming and video management duties. The T 777 V3 is fully compatible with BluOS and can play content through the sixth of nine assignable inputs. It also works with all Bluesound products as part of a whole-house audio solution. The module comes in the form of a USB dongle that plugs into the back.

Physically, the T 777 V3 looks identical to the T 758 V3 and is in fact, the same width and height while being about an inch deeper. It also weighs 12 pounds more thanks to that toroid and the additional card cages. The front panel is simple and contains just a large volume knob; buttons for source selection, menu, and listening mode; and an information display. To its left is a nav pad that allows many settings to be made without turning on your TV or projector. A small cover on the right opens to reveal RCA, optical, and HDMI inputs.

The back panel is a card-cage design with five slots that supports NAD’s Modular Design Construction philosophy of “planned evolution” rather than “planned obsolescence.” You will have little trouble upgrading and updating the T 777 V3 for a long time to come. While I don’t believe any product is truly future-proof, this receiver comes about as close as it can to that elusive description.

The AM230 digital audio board houses coax and digital audio inputs plus line outs for four more height channels should you want to install a full 7.1.4 Dolby Atmos system. HDMI inputs number six, five in back and one in front, along with two outputs. All are version 2.0a with HDCP 2.2, ARC, and CEC. Two additional cards carry all the analog inputs and two tape loops, something you won’t find too often these days. You also get multi-channel inputs and pre-outs for use with an external power amp. Control options are extensive with RS-232, an IR hub (one in, three out), and three 12v trigger outputs.

The photo shows all five slots populated with cards but my sample did not have the analog video board installed. That one costs extra though I can’t imagine too many users opting for it. By default, the four cards I mentioned in the previous paragraph ship with the unit.

The remote is a significant upgrade from the T 758 V3, mainly because it’s not only backlit, but motion-sensitive too. Just picking it up engages a bright blue glow behind all the buttons. It features discrete keys for power and source. Menu navigation is the middle, then you get a number pad and transport keys. It’s a learning remote too, capable of controlling seven additional devices with macro ability.

Dirac Live

In my recent review of the T 758 V3 receiver, I spoke at length about Dirac Live and NAD’s implementation of it. One thing I failed to point out is that in that product, and in the T 777 V3, the LE version is included in the box. If you want the full package, it’s $99 extra. Both versions allow you to edit your target curves, but the Full package provides correction from 20Hz to 20kHz versus LE’s 20-500Hz. In either case though, you get full frequency impulse response correction. This, in my opinion, is Dirac’s big draw over Audyssey and other similar correction solutions. I talked about the effect of this in my T 758 V3 review and in my CES 2018 coverage where I enjoyed an amazing two-channel demo. To refresh your memory, impulse response correction involves not only setting channel delays properly, but also optimizing the phase of the individual drivers in each speaker cabinet. Keeping all transducers in phase is a concept that’s been proven in high-end speakers from the likes of KEF and Thiel who place tweeters on-axis with midrange and bass drivers to create a single-point sound source. Ultimately, quality is best when the sound from every driver in the system reaches your ears at once.

NAD includes a free download of the Dirac software plus a USB microphone in the box. To run the correction routine, you’ll need a laptop computer and a Wi-Fi network to sync everything up and run the measurements.

Setup

The T 777 V3 has sufficient speaker outputs for a 5.1.2 setup so I used a pair of PSB Imagine XA Dolby Atmos modules placed atop my Axiom LFR1100 towers as front height channels. I did not wire the rear baffle so they functioned as M100s for this review. The remaining channels were handled by a VP180 center and two QS8 surrounds. The receiver’s binding posts will accept every kind of connector including my chunky locking bananas. Once I tightened their collars down, solid contact was assured.

My single source component was an OPPO UDP-203 universal player. I wired it via HDMI to the receiver’s first input and connected a coax cable for jitter-free two-channel music. I always find a little better-quality listening that way as HDMI sometimes introduces minor timing errors. I wasn’t able to test 4K video this time as JVC asked for their DLA-RS640 back. I made do with my Anthem LTX-500 1080p display.

To configure the extra speaker modules for Dolby Atmos, I had to assign amps to them in the setup menu. That’s a fairly simple matter. Start in Amplifier Setup where you can direct the extra amps to rear surround, front height, or rear height. You can also use them for additional zones if you like. Then in Speaker Configuration, set the height channels to Dolby Enabled Front.

Since Dirac only applies frequency and impulse response correction, and sets levels, you’ll have to input the crossovers yourself. I used my usual values of 40Hz for the front three and 100Hz for the surround and height channels.

The next step is to get the T 777 V3 on the Wi-Fi network. For that, I followed the instructions in the BluOS app. That was followed by a firmware update which took about 10 minutes. Once complete, I installed the Dirac Live software and run the room correction procedure. Following the directions and performing nine measurements took me about half an hour. Everything worked exactly like it did for the T 758 V3. I wondered if I might be able to download the same correction file from that receiver into the T 777 V3 but the projects are specific to each product. I therefore went through the same measurement layout as before, and got identical results. If you’d like to see my graphs, please refer to the T 758 V3 review.

With room correction in place, it’s time for some listening!

In Use

With this review coming hard on the heels of my T 758 V3 evaluation, it’s hard not to make comparisons. I realize that a four-week gap is too long to make a fair back-to-back in terms of sound quality, but I decided to watch the same movies and listen to the same music to see if the T 777 V3 made me feel any different. Obviously, they will have similar sound characteristics but there is always an intangible something that appears when listening to really good audio gear.

Dolby Atmos

Wonder Woman has a rich and dynamic Dolby Atmos encode and even though I had just two additional front height channels, the effect was easily perceived. There’s surround sound, then there’s immersive sound. The latter pulls you into the scene and delivers audio the way on-screen characters experience it. When Diana and Steve walk into a large London clothing store, the murmur and bustle of shoppers immediately enveloped me in a way not possible with just 5.1. That extra height information is subtle but it does enhance the film. Bass effects in the final showdown between Diana and Aries were so strong, they rattled the NAD’s remote backlight into action. I actually had to turn it over to avoid distraction.

Sticking with the super-hero theme, I cued up Batman v Superman, Dawn of Justice. I was particularly drawn into an underwater scene where I truly felt like I was diving for treasure. The T 777 V3 sounds amazing here and I was inspired to add more speakers to my theater for even better Atmos. Again, the bass was superbly controlled as it pounded out the action.

Secrets Sponsor

Jigsaw is a love-it-or-hate-it kind of film but it has plenty of opportunities for Atmos to show its mettle. In one scene, two hapless victims find themselves in a silo with grain pouring in around them as they are buried alive. I was nearly buried myself in the immersive effect caused by a simple hiss, properly placed. When mixed correctly, Dolby Atmos enhances the experience just as much as things like Ultra HD and HDR.

One note about Dirac Live: I tried watching with and without correction and was surprised at how good things sounded with it off. I still prefer the assistance, especially for the bass but the T 777 V3 delivers an amazingly balanced sound all by itself. While I would normally use Dirac, this receiver doesn’t make it a must like other products I’ve heard.

Two-Channel Music

To check out the T 777 V3’s ability to play a crappy recording of a great performance, I turned to the New York Philharmonic and Shostakovich’s Symphony No. 5. The fidelity is fairly harsh and tinny with little real bass or hall reverb to help matters. Despite those flaws, the NAD had no difficulty rendering the finest details and bringing the brass and woodwinds to the fore when appropriate. Strings had a clean sound that was never mushy and I enjoyed the CD thoroughly.
A much better recording is that of Daphnis and Chloe, performed by the Chicago Symphony. Far more love was given to this exquisite performance. It just shimmers and sparkles with textures found only in French Impressionist music. Ravel was a master, not only of this style, but of orchestration and that expertise shows through, thanks to the T 777 V3.

My real epiphany happened when I spun my copy of Physical Graffiti from Led Zeppelin. My favorite track is In My Time of Dying, a blues classic and a Jimmy Page performance that will never be topped. I’ve heard this song a hundred times but the T 777 V3 introduced me to Jimmy’s amplifier in a whole new way. My Axiom towers were literally turned into a guitar amp as I could hear and feel every bit of that crunchy distortion. The NAD succeeded in creating a texture where I didn’t expect it. Tactility doesn’t only come from subwoofers, apparently. After listening a little longer, I was inspired to do something I hadn’t done in many years, remove my speaker grills. The difference was subtle but audible, and it drew me even further into the music. This is Led Zeppelin at their finest and I’ve never heard this CD sound better.

I kept going with Foo Fighters’ Sonic Highways. These talented guys love their distortion too though here, it’s a little tighter and cleaner, some might say more processed but I love it just the same. I changed my front speakers to Large in the OSD to remove the sub from the equation and found I loved it even more. My LFR1100s are capable full-range towers and the T 777 V3 made them shine. By the time I finished my long, wonderful afternoon of listening, I came to the realization that this receiver is easily the best NAD receiver I’ve heard to date. “Wow” just doesn’t do it justice.

Conclusions

The NAD T 777 V3 AV SURROUND SOUND RECEIVER delivers high-end performance at a mid-fi price. With easy upgradeability, it has few equals at this or any price point.

Likes
  • Phenomenal sound, rich in dynamics and detail
  • Dirac Live correction is very effective at fixing room issues
  • Plays loud and has no trouble with low-impedance speakers
  • Monolithic build quality
Would Like To See
  • I can’t imagine anything that could make it better

I’ve talked in the past about the divide between receivers and separates. I’m a separates snob for sure and I really enjoy the power and in-your-face presentation of my Emotiva amplifiers. The NAD T 777 V3 is the first receiver I’ve ever heard that challenges that snobbery. In all honesty, if someone switched my gear and I walked into the room blindfolded, I doubt I could tell anything had changed. This receiver is truly that good. At $2499, it certainly qualifies as a flagship. But it should be noted that there are high-end receivers that cost more without delivering superior sonics.

Feature-wise, it may not have dozens of listening modes or a zillion streaming options but with BluOS, what more could one need? There are thousands of music and content feeds out there, all at your fingertips thanks to the app. And with Dirac Live room correction, it has a tweakability that easily outpaces other solutions. After hearing it and the T 758 V3, I’m just looking for an opportunity to replace my trusty but aging Integra processor and its Audyssey system.

The NAD T 777 V3 AV Surround Sound Receiver can easily compete with and replace separates. It will drive demanding speakers and has more than enough headroom to play loud without distortion. HDMI 2.0a supports the latest 4K video with 10-bit color and HDR. And you needn’t worry about obsolescence. Modular Design Construction makes the T 777 V3 about as future-proof as any product can be. It might even be the last receiver you ever buy. Once you’ve heard it, I think you’ll agree. It earns my Highest Recommendation.

Chris Eberle

Chris' passion for audio began when he took up playing the bassoon at age 12. During his third year at the New England Conservatory of Music, he won a position with the West Point Band where he served for 26 years as principal bassoonist. He retired from the Army in 2013 and is now writing full time and performing as a freelance musician in Central Florida. As an avid movie lover, Chris was unable to turn away the 50-inch Samsung DLP TV that arrived at his door one day, thus launching him irrevocably into an obsession with home theater. Dissatisfied with the image quality of his new acquisition, Chris trained with the Imaging Science Foundation in 2006 and became a professional display calibrator. His ultimate theater desires were realized when he completed construction of a dedicated cinema/listening room in his home. Chris is extremely fortunate that his need for quality audio and video is shared and supported by his wife of over 25 years. In his spare time he enjoys riding his recumbent trike at least 100 miles per week, trying out new restaurants, going to theme parks and spending as much time as possible watching movies and listening to music. Chris enjoys bringing his observations and discoveries about every kind of home theater product to as many curious and well-informed readers as possible. He is proud to be a part of the Team and hopes to help everyone enjoy their AV experiences to the fullest.

View Comments

  • Up in maple syrup country, the price difference between the 758 and 777 is 1700$ + 15% taxes vs 3500$ + 15% taxes--a not inconsiderable difference. So, for the difference, you get a nicer remote, more I/O for HDMI, somewhat more powerful amplification...am I missing anything else of significance? My question, then, for someone on a budget, is it worth messing with HDMI switch boxes (I need, at minimum, 6 inputs and 2 outputs) to save money or is there something essential about the 777 that sets it so far apart from the 758 that the switch box option is not worth considering?

    Seven years ago, I ended up not going with the Anthem MRX 300 because it had 4/1 HDMI I/O and I was tired of the switch box solution I'd lived with for a couple of years with my non-HDMI AVR. I've been quite happy with the Yamaha RX-A1000 I ended up with (added an Anti-mode 8033 for the sub EQing). However, I'm thinking of moving the RX-A1000 to my living room secondary system (to replace the now 15 year old AVR that moved there) and was set to go with the Anthem MRX 520 (as it has enough I/Os) until reading up on Dirac. Seems I'm always one generation out of sync re: wants and budget.

    Ultimately, I guess the question becomes, is Dirac so much better than ARC that I should go with the switch boxes to meet my needs (MRX 520 and T 758 are the same price, within a few dollars). OR is the T 777 worth the big step up (and same goes for MRX 720--both the same price, again within a few dollars)?

    • Yes you are missing something, 2 things in fact...Network and BluOS implementations. The 758 has a clunky outboard USB sort of dongle thing. Really it's sort of a USB hub thingy into which you must plug a 3rd party USB WiFi device because.....758 has no Ethernet without it. Apparently BluOS resides on this dongle ...the dongle has usb inputs the WiFi device plugs into one of those I assume the other thing plugged into this hub is the BluOS device. Also all of this plugs into the only usb port on the receiver. Really look up the 758 review... there is a picture...not pretty.
      The 777's network/BluOS implementation is via NAD's inboard MDC card which comes with Ethernet port.. Also the 758's only expansion (MDC) slot is occupied. The 777 has 3 expansion slots 2 of which are occupied so one open. The review mentions this also not sure if the 777 has WiFi I wonder if you could just find a USB WiFi plug in the one on the 758's is an IOGear (I think).
      To sum it up, The 777 is more a advanced chassis that offers a more powerful better integrated solution with better features and flexibility. IMHOP ...yes its worth it. On the Anthem/NAD no input other than over the years Anthem has come and gone whereas NAD has been more or less a constant presence. My one Anthem experience did not meet expectations however I have been in and out of multiple NAD solutions. I always have a couple of NAD amps around just in case.
      Does Anthem support MQA or Roon? No I think. Tidal masters using MQA (via BluOS) has been a revelation for me. Further the 777 is Roon Ready. Roon and Tidal integrate beautifully with whatever your digital library is. Yes Tidal and Roon are for pay services but together with supporting hardware are just unbeatable. Oh yeah with DIrac as the magic sauce.

      • Ah. I guess I missed a few items. However, I have no ambitions to use wifi for anything other than what I do now (Airplay stream Apple Music to an Airport Express digitally wired to my AVR). I have an older laptop, also digitally wired, to my AVR for playback of lossless files in my iTunes (ripped from CD to ALAC lossless). For my critical listening, I'm still old school--CDs, SACDs, DVD-As on shiny discs via my Oppo BDP-83. For me, the interesting "new toys" are better room compensation protocols than my current 9 year old YPAO + Antimode 8033 and, possibly, but not strictly necessary, Atmos in 5.1.2 configuration. I can soldier on for a while longer in any case--my current Yamaha would simply move to the living room to replace an even older Integra DTR 6.4 that is no longer fully functional (but serviceable in 2 channel for now). So if the main benefits of 777 are wifi/streaming oriented, that's not a priority for me (but it's cool that it can do all those things well for anyone who wants them). The extras, at the moment, do not seem to justify a doubling of cost for me. But thanks for the additional info. Much appreciated.

        • Thanks for the pic, as for Ethernet how do you load drivers for something like that on the 758? Yes the 777 does it the same way. I'm really glad to get MQA support at this price point. It might have been more elegant to engineer a BlueOS card with WiFi and required BlueTooth for that unused slot in the 777. Also both are Roon ready so "the lord giveth and the lord taketh away" My preference would be to get it all with no clunky dongle. Now the question would be .... how would this receiver sound compared to others at this price point without Roon/BlueOS? There is lots of competition. How much does Dirac Live impact the equation? Can I buy a better receiver with an outboard dac like the Project S2 (RoonReady/MQA support) and do better? Mind you I'm posing these as rhetorical questions. I like NAD products but one has to wonder.

          • No drivers, just plug and play. You need the WiFi dongle still plugged in for it to work (BluOS relies on the serial number or something to function) just don't connect it to a wireless network

            The dongle is hidden behind the amp, so personally I don't care how it looks

            There's always "better" to be had, but the law of diminishing returns comes into play pretty hard. The 758v3 is crazy good value for money, especially considering it has 12 channels of Dirac Live capability inside

  • I realize I am reviving an old article. Sorry. I am seriously considering the t777v3 for an AV solution. As I recall from decades ago when I was consumed by all things Hi Fi... NAD was a great sounding solution that didn't cost a year's salary to acquire it. But things change over the years etc... and so I am curious as to its sound quality vs another mid-fi solution such as the Marantz 7704 pre pro with a decent 5-7ch amp... or another mid-fi solution -- the Outlaw 976 with a separate multi channel amp... sadly I had to sell off my hi end 2 ch gear, and for now I don't have the means to purchase what I would love to drive my B&W CDM9NT with. So I am looking for a satisfactory stop gap for now. Suggestions?

    • Hi Brian, maybe i am too late.. buttttttt....
      Review NAD V777

      t struck me that most reviews
      are so positive and why I always have "second-thoughts" with many
      products. So I find a review of someone who is happy with his or her new
      acquisition and exchanged his 13 year old washing machine for a new one and
      then amazed about the handy short washing program I find rather weird.
      As if after 13 years you buy a
      new car and you are full of praise that you no longer have to open your door
      with the key or that the outside temperature is displayed in the dashboard.
      You can expect things objectively
      and realistically nowadays and because of this possibility, in my view the
      product has not risen in sight.
      In addition, many reviews are
      written by hobbyists, experiential experts or (self-appointed) experts. In my
      opinion they do not have a good starting point, after all installation and
      app's are cut cake (or even a nice challenge) for them.
      So they will generally have no
      problems with installing and adjusting the product. A cardiologist simply
      performs an open heart operation, which is a "challenge" for the
      average consumer.

      For years, a friend of mine tried
      to tell the world that his brand was the only real car until he borrowed my car
      for a weekend.
      What I want to say is that if you
      have little or no comparison material, you will soon be inclined to let your
      personal emotion speak and reflect your vision.

      Because my Denon amplifier failed
      for the 4th time in 6 years and I wanted a step better amplifier for my Focal
      set, I bought the Arcam vesterker from I-ear in Tilburg. Great good service and
      a super nice sound but the Arcam could not handle my TV, but waited until the
      NAD V777 came out. Other options I did not have because of the oa. the heat
      development of the other amplifiers.

      Appearance
      Well this is really personal but
      in my opinion black is the right color for the amplifier. He should not be
      noticed because it is to see an old-fashioned thing. Buttons of 7 mm small, a
      display from the previous millennium and a plastic cover that is always crooked
      has a different color and surface structure as the metal of the amplifier.

      Sound technical
      Every disadvantage has its
      advantage, also here.
      o my liking, my previous cleaner
      (Denon) had a very colored sound, a kind of CSI-Miami but then on sound. I
      wanted a somewhat clearer and more true-to-life sound. After the installation I
      was not immediately sold and therefore I-Ear has been back again and has
      downloaded, installed and tuned the Dirac Premium.
      But to my personal taste it all
      sounded rather emotionless, fragile and empty.
      Really total on the other side of
      the Denon spectrum.
      I doubted if this was the MP3
      sound of Spotify so I installed Tidal and I installed other speaker cables.
      Never am I rapted by a classic piece or never have I the need to sing Despacito
      regardless of the volume. And so the sound can not appeal to me but please note
      ... this is my opinion, it may well be that someone else loves the sound! !!

      Ease of use

      Luckily I-Ear helped me a lot
      because I could not (so quickly) install the (Plug and pRay) Bleu ... ..

      Here, too, I do not want to give
      my opinion, but objectively suggest something.

      If I want music I do the
      following.

      I turn on the amplifier.

      I turn on my tablet (or laptop or
      phone).

      I unlock my tablet.

      I select the Blueos app.

      I select menu

      Then I select my presets.

      Then the desired radio station
      and then I sound pretty fast.

      All this takes about 15 seconds.

      You can better get up to speed up
      the news.

      And this
      is still the "fast" version, if I want to listen to something from a
      streaming service, I have to do a few more actions that will prevent you from
      coming out under 30 seconds.

      Power.

      For me personally, power is
      personal, I do not play heavy, heavy-carrying music or rock-hard guitar solos,
      so in this area I do not worry about what I think.

      What is a given fact is that if I
      have a visit and a random radio station plays in the background, I have the
      volume around 25 to 30 percent of the maximum power.

      When I play a film (The Firm or A
      Few Good Man) about my 5.1 Focal set in my living room of a small 25 m2 I have
      the amplifier at 80 percent of the power. If I spin an action movie I would like
      to give him some more volume. But my audio heart is gnawing at me because I
      know this is the same as always driving full throttle with a car.

      Benefits

      Simply control volume back and
      center speakers volume via remote control.

      No neighbors quarrels because you
      cause noise pollution. I also think fairly true-to-life sound, no heat
      development.

      Conclusion

      If I
      have to give a total assessment, this is a good and fine amplifier ...... for a
      suggested retail price of - less than a thousand euros. This amplifier or brand
      is not alone but nowadays you can expect more as what the amplifiers in general
      now offer. As long as you do not know how it works (normal sized buttons, and
      default start-up at the last set station - like a car radio has been doing for
      50 years), this is what it is.

  • Concerning the 777 vs. the 758 I have a question. One of the major shortcomings to the 758 for me personally, is that the Blue OS system, being digital, cannot be streamed to the zone 2 or B speakers. If I'm going to be listening to high quality streamed music (and I most certainly will), I'd like to also be able to listen to it on my zone 2 to 4 external speaker sets through my switch box. With the 758, I definitely am not able to do this. Is it any different on the 777? If not, I might as well buy the 758 and add an additio
    nal (redundant) BlueSound Node product connected through analog so I can stream to both zone 1 and 2.

Recent Posts

TAD Labs Introduces the Reference Series TAD-C700 Preamplifier

Major refinements inside and out have taken the already solid performer to the next level…

5 hours ago

AXPONA 2024 Show Coverage Part 2.

Welcome everyone to the second installment of our AXPONA 2024 coverage. Just to quickly reiterate,…

7 hours ago

Juke Audio Juke+ Streaming Multi-Zone Amplifier

Can you use the words simple and whole house audio in the same sentence? I…

24 hours ago

Sennheiser Factory Tour

I got a chance to partake in an exclusive outing to Sennheiser's HQ in Tullamore…

2 days ago

Quad Revela 2 Floor-standing Speaker Review.

An elegant and buttoned-down loudspeaker that can still “kick it,” old school! Because of this…

3 days ago

Sonus faber Lumina II Amator Bookshelf Speaker Review

Sonus faber delivers high style and high performance from its Lumina II Amator Bookshelf Speakers.…

1 week ago